Commit b82876f2ce71e79709f33632ed0c21b52155e5f9

Authored by Elena.Budnik
1 parent fff983f7

ros lap modifs

NumericalData/AMDA/Rosetta/LAP/ros-lap-asw.xml
... ... @@ -5,12 +5,9 @@
5 5 <ResourceID>spase://CDPP/NumericalData/AMDA/Rosetta/LAP/ros-lap-asw</ResourceID>
6 6 <ResourceHeader>
7 7 <ResourceName>parameters from sweeps (ASW)</ResourceName>
8   - <AlternateName>Analyzed sweeps (ASW). Miscellaneous physical
9   -high-level quantities derived from individual sweeps.</AlternateName>
  8 + <AlternateName>Analyzed sweeps (ASW). Miscellaneous physical high-level quantities derived from individual sweeps.</AlternateName>
10 9 <ReleaseDate>2016-10-15T14:08:29Z</ReleaseDate>
11   - <Description>Time series of sweep-based estimates of electron
12   -density, ion bulk speed, electron temperature, and photoelectron knee
13   -potential. Timestamps represent the middle of the corresponding sweeps.</Description>
  10 + <Description>Time series of sweep-based estimates of electron density, ion bulk speed, electron temperature, and photoelectron knee potential. Timestamps represent the middle of the corresponding sweeps.</Description>
14 11 <Contact>
15 12 <PersonID>spase://CDPP/Person/Anders.Eriksson</PersonID>
16 13 <Role>PrincipalInvestigator</Role>
... ... @@ -20,13 +17,21 @@ potential. Timestamps represent the middle of the corresponding sweeps.&lt;/Descrip
20 17 <Role>DataProducer</Role>
21 18 </Contact>
22 19 <InformationURL>
  20 + <Name>RPC User Guide</Name>
  21 + <URL>http://amda.irap.omp.eu/help/parameters/RPC_USER_GUIDE.PDF</URL>
  22 + </InformationURL>
  23 + <InformationURL>
23 24 <Name>RPC LAP User Guide</Name>
24 25 <URL>http://amda.irap.omp.eu/help/parameters/RO-IRFU-LAP-UG.PDF</URL>
25 26 </InformationURL>
26 27 <InformationURL>
27   - <Name>ROSETTA RPC-LAP to Planetary Science Archive Interface Control Document</Name>
  28 + <Name>RPC-LAP to Planetary Science Archive Interface Control Document</Name>
28 29 <URL>http://amda.irap.omp.eu/help/parameters/RO-IRFU-LAP-EAICD.PDF</URL>
29 30 </InformationURL>
  31 + <InformationURL>
  32 + <Name>RPC-LAP Report on cross-calibration of LAP data to measurements by other RPC instruments</Name>
  33 + <URL>http://amda.irap.omp.eu/help/parameters/RO-IRFU-LAP-XCAL.PDF</URL>
  34 + </InformationURL>
30 35 </ResourceHeader>
31 36 <AccessInformation>
32 37 <RepositoryID>spase://SMWG/Repository/CDPP/AMDA</RepositoryID>
... ... @@ -49,13 +54,13 @@ potential. Timestamps represent the middle of the corresponding sweeps.&lt;/Descrip
49 54 <Cadence_Min>PT0.016S</Cadence_Min>
50 55 <Cadence_Max>PT128S</Cadence_Max>
51 56 </TemporalDescription>
52   - <Caveats>* n_e - electron density is calculated from the slope of the probe curve where electron collection dominates, which should be proportional to the plasma density divided by the square root of the electron temperature [Eriksson et al., 2017]. An electron temperature is assumed to be fixed (value of 5 eV) which has been found suitable for giving densities comparable to MIP at the points where both instruments have data. A user who wishes to use another fixed Te, or use the sweep derived T_E, may scale N_E by the square root of Te/(5 eV). While N_E works well in low density plasmas, severe underestimation can result in high density plasmas where Vsc becomes very negative.
53   - * i_photosat - photosaturation current derived from individual sweep (LAP1). As LAP1 has shown no significant contamination effects, these estimates should be directly proportional to the EUV flux at Rosetta position in the 20-130 nm band.
54   - * v_i bulk - effective ion speed derived from individual sweep (speed; always non-negative scalar), while assuming a specific ion mass. Cross-calibrated with RPCMIP.
  57 + <Caveats>* n_e_fix_t - electron density is calculated from the slope of the probe curve where electron collection dominates, which should be proportional to the plasma density divided by the square root of the electron temperature [Eriksson et al., 2017]. An electron temperature is assumed to be fixed (value of 5 eV) which has been found suitable for giving densities comparable to MIP at the points where both instruments have data. A user who wishes to use another fixed Te, or use the sweep derived T_E, may scale N_E by the square root of Te/(5 eV). While N_E works well in low density plasmas, severe underestimation can result in high density plasmas where Vsc becomes very negative.
  58 + * i_ph0_s - photosaturation current derived from individual sweep (LAP1). As LAP1 has shown no significant contamination effects, these estimates should be directly proportional to the EUV flux at Rosetta position in the 20-130 nm band.
  59 + * v_ion_eff_xcal - effective ion speed derived from individual sweep (speed; always non-negative scalar), while assuming a specific ion mass. Cross-calibrated with RPCMIP.
55 60 * t_e - electron temperature derived from exponential part of sweep. The temperature from the exponential slope of the retarding electron current (a least-square fit slope of the logarithm of the current, after subtraction of a fitted ion current) refers to the warm electron population. If the automatic identification of the retarding electron current region is poor, this estimate can be quite noisy and have a large random spread.
56   - * t_e_xcalc - electron temperature, derived by using the linear part of the electron current of the sweep, and density measurement from RPCMIP. The interpretation should be that when T_E_XCAL has a value below 1 eV, there is a cold electron population present. As the relative fractions of the warm and cold electrons are unknown, the provided value of T_E_XCAL should be interpreted as an upper limit to the temperature of the cold electrons.
  61 + * t_e_xcal - electron temperature, derived by using the linear part of the electron current of the sweep, and density measurement from RPCMIP. The interpretation should be that when T_E_XCAL has a value below 1 eV, there is a cold electron population present. As the relative fractions of the warm and cold electrons are unknown, the provided value of T_E_XCAL should be interpreted as an upper limit to the temperature of the cold electrons.
57 62 * It should be noted that the absolute accuracy of the two Te estimates is not well constrained as there is little independent data to compare to. T_E_XCAL should be seen as an approximate upper value for the cold electron temperature, while T_E should not be considered to estimate the warm electron temperature better than by a factor of two.
58   - * u_sc - spacecraft potential derived from the voltage where the photoelectron emission current from the probe transits from being constant at lower votages to decaying with increasing voltage, clearly visible as a knee.
  63 + * v+ph_knee - spacecraft potential derived from the voltage where the photoelectron emission current from the probe transits from being constant at lower votages to decaying with increasing voltage, clearly visible as a knee.
59 64  
60 65 Quality Flag :
61 66  
... ... @@ -76,7 +81,7 @@ potential. Timestamps represent the middle of the corresponding sweeps.&lt;/Descrip
76 81  
77 82 </Caveats>
78 83 <Parameter>
79   - <Name>n_e</Name>
  84 + <Name>n_e_fix_t</Name>
80 85 <ParameterKey>ros_lap_neft</ParameterKey>
81 86 <Description>Electron density derived from individual sweep. An electron temperature is assumed to be fixed (value of 5 eV)</Description>
82 87 <Ucd/>
... ... @@ -87,7 +92,7 @@ potential. Timestamps represent the middle of the corresponding sweeps.&lt;/Descrip
87 92 <FillValue>-1.e+09</FillValue>
88 93 </Parameter>
89 94 <Parameter>
90   - <Name>n_e : qual</Name>
  95 + <Name>n_e_fix_t : qual</Name>
91 96 <ParameterKey>ros_lap_neft_q</ParameterKey>
92 97 <Description>Quality value in the range 0 (worst) to 1 (best). Corresponds to goodness of fit or how well the model fits the data</Description>
93 98 <Ucd/>
... ... @@ -120,7 +125,7 @@ potential. Timestamps represent the middle of the corresponding sweeps.&lt;/Descrip
120 125 <FillValue></FillValue>
121 126 </Parameter>
122 127 <Parameter>
123   - <Name>t_e_xcalc</Name>
  128 + <Name>t_e_xcal</Name>
124 129 <ParameterKey>ros_lap_te_xcalc</ParameterKey>
125 130 <Description>Electron temperature, derived by using the linear part of the electron current of the sweep, and density measurement from RPCMIP.</Description>
126 131 <Ucd/>
... ... @@ -131,7 +136,7 @@ potential. Timestamps represent the middle of the corresponding sweeps.&lt;/Descrip
131 136 <FillValue>-1.e+09</FillValue>
132 137 </Parameter>
133 138 <Parameter>
134   - <Name>t_e_xcalc : qual</Name>
  139 + <Name>t_e_xcal : qual</Name>
135 140 <ParameterKey>ros_lap_te_xcalc_q</ParameterKey>
136 141 <Description>Quality value in the range 0 (worst) to 1 (best). Corresponds to goodness of fit or how well the model fits the data</Description>
137 142 <Ucd/>
... ... @@ -142,7 +147,7 @@ potential. Timestamps represent the middle of the corresponding sweeps.&lt;/Descrip
142 147 <FillValue></FillValue>
143 148 </Parameter>
144 149 <Parameter>
145   - <Name>i_photosat</Name>
  150 + <Name>i_ph0_s</Name>
146 151 <ParameterKey>ros_lap_ipho</ParameterKey>
147 152 <Description>Photosaturation current derived from individual sweep. As LAP1 has shown no significant
148 153 contamination effects, these estimates should be directly proportional to the EUV flux at Rosetta position in the 20-130 nm band.</Description>
... ... @@ -154,7 +159,7 @@ contamination effects, these estimates should be directly proportional to the EU
154 159 <FillValue>-1.e+09</FillValue>
155 160 </Parameter>
156 161 <Parameter>
157   - <Name>i_photosat : qual</Name>
  162 + <Name>i_ph0_s : qual</Name>
158 163 <ParameterKey>ros_lap_ipho_q</ParameterKey>
159 164 <Description>Quality value in the range 0 (worst) to 1 (best). Corresponds to goodness of fit or how well the model fits the data</Description>
160 165 <Ucd/>
... ... @@ -165,7 +170,7 @@ contamination effects, these estimates should be directly proportional to the EU
165 170 <FillValue></FillValue>
166 171 </Parameter>
167 172 <Parameter>
168   - <Name>v_i bulk</Name>
  173 + <Name>v_ion_eff_xcal</Name>
169 174 <ParameterKey>ros_lap_vi_asw</ParameterKey>
170 175 <Description>Effective ion speed derived from individual sweep (speed; always non-negative scalar), while assuming a specific ion mass. Cross-calibrated with RPCMIP</Description>
171 176 <Ucd/>
... ... @@ -176,7 +181,7 @@ contamination effects, these estimates should be directly proportional to the EU
176 181 <FillValue>-1.e+09</FillValue>
177 182 </Parameter>
178 183 <Parameter>
179   - <Name>v_i bulk : qual</Name>
  184 + <Name>v_ion_eff_xcal : qual</Name>
180 185 <ParameterKey>ros_lap_vi_asw_q</ParameterKey>
181 186 <Description>Quality value in the range 0 (worst) to 1 (best). Corresponds to goodness of fit or how well the model fits the data</Description>
182 187 <Ucd/>
... ... @@ -187,7 +192,7 @@ contamination effects, these estimates should be directly proportional to the EU
187 192 <FillValue/>
188 193 </Parameter>
189 194 <Parameter>
190   - <Name>u_sc</Name>
  195 + <Name>v_ph_knee</Name>
191 196 <ParameterKey>ros_lap_usc_asw</ParameterKey>
192 197 <Description>Photoelectron knee potential</Description>
193 198 <Ucd/>
... ... @@ -198,7 +203,7 @@ contamination effects, these estimates should be directly proportional to the EU
198 203 <FillValue>-1.e+09</FillValue>
199 204 </Parameter>
200 205 <Parameter>
201   - <Name>u_sc : qual</Name>
  206 + <Name>v_ph_knee : qual</Name>
202 207 <ParameterKey>ros_lap_usc_asw_q</ParameterKey>
203 208 <Description>Quality value in the range 0 (worst) to 1 (best). Corresponds to goodness of fit or how well the model fits the data</Description>
204 209 <Ucd/>
... ... @@ -211,8 +216,7 @@ contamination effects, these estimates should be directly proportional to the EU
211 216 <Parameter>
212 217 <Name>quality flag</Name>
213 218 <ParameterKey>ros_lap_asw_f</ParameterKey>
214   - <Description>Quality flag constructed as the sum of multiple terms,
215   -depending on what quality related effects are present. Each digit is either in
  219 + <Description>Quality flag constructed as the sum of multiple terms, depending on what quality related effects are present. Each digit is either in
216 220 the range 0 (best) to 7 (worst), or 9 (not used)</Description>
217 221 <Ucd/>
218 222 <Units/>
... ...
NumericalData/AMDA/Rosetta/LAP/ros-lap-efl.xml
... ... @@ -44,13 +44,21 @@ sounding rockets in the terrestrial ionosphere [Maynard, 1998].
44 44 <Role>DataProducer</Role>
45 45 </Contact>
46 46 <InformationURL>
  47 + <Name>RPC User Guide</Name>
  48 + <URL>http://amda.irap.omp.eu/help/parameters/RPC_USER_GUIDE.PDF</URL>
  49 + </InformationURL>
  50 + <InformationURL>
47 51 <Name>RPC LAP User Guide</Name>
48 52 <URL>http://amda.irap.omp.eu/help/parameters/RO-IRFU-LAP-UG.PDF</URL>
49   - </InformationURL>
  53 + </InformationURL>
50 54 <InformationURL>
51   - <Name>ROSETTA RPC-LAP to Planetary Science Archive Interface Control Document</Name>
  55 + <Name>RPC-LAP to Planetary Science Archive Interface Control Document</Name>
52 56 <URL>http://amda.irap.omp.eu/help/parameters/RO-IRFU-LAP-EAICD.PDF</URL>
53 57 </InformationURL>
  58 + <InformationURL>
  59 + <Name>RPC-LAP Report on cross-calibration of LAP data to measurements by other RPC instruments</Name>
  60 + <URL>http://amda.irap.omp.eu/help/parameters/RO-IRFU-LAP-XCAL.PDF</URL>
  61 + </InformationURL>
54 62 </ResourceHeader>
55 63 <AccessInformation>
56 64 <RepositoryID>spase://SMWG/Repository/CDPP/AMDA</RepositoryID>
... ... @@ -100,9 +108,7 @@ sounding rockets in the terrestrial ionosphere [Maynard, 1998].
100 108 * +200 - One of two meanings: (1) For LAP1: LDL disturbance (LAP2 in LDL mode); (2) For LAP2: Contamination signature possibly present
101 109 * +400 - Saturation
102 110  
103   - Example: suppose that one encounters the quality flag โ€œ109โ€. 109 = 100 + 9 means (1) that there is an ongoing wheel off-loading (+100), and (2) that the quality-related effects associated with +1 and +2 cannot occur even in principle for the kind of data that one is looking at.
104   -
105   -
  111 + Example: suppose that one encounters the quality flag โ€œ109โ€. 109 = 100 + 9 means (1) that there is an ongoing wheel off-loading (+100), and (2) that the quality-related effects associated with +1 and +2 cannot occur even in principle for the kind of data that one is looking at.
106 112 </Caveats>
107 113 <Parameter>
108 114 <Name>e-field comp</Name>
... ...
NumericalData/AMDA/Rosetta/LAP/ros-lap-est.xml deleted
... ... @@ -1,71 +0,0 @@
1   -<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
2   -<Spase xmlns="http://www.spase-group.org/data/schema" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.spase-group.org/data/schema http://cdpp.irap.omp.eu/AMDA-NG/public/schemas/spase-amda-1_2_0.xsd">
3   - <Version>2.2.6</Version>
4   - <NumericalData>
5   - <ResourceID>spase://CDPP/NumericalData/AMDA/Rosetta/LAP/ros-lap-est</ResourceID>
6   - <ResourceHeader>
7   - <ResourceName>estimated plasma parameters</ResourceName>
8   - <AlternateName>estimated plasma parameters : preliminary </AlternateName>
9   - <ReleaseDate>2016-10-15T14:08:29Z</ReleaseDate>
10   - <Description/>
11   - <Contact>
12   - <PersonID>spase://CDPP/Person/Anders.Eriksson</PersonID>
13   - <Role>PrincipalInvestigator</Role>
14   - </Contact>
15   - <Contact>
16   - <PersonID>spase://CDPP/Person/Erik.Johansson</PersonID>
17   - <Role>DataProducer</Role>
18   - </Contact>
19   - </ResourceHeader>
20   - <AccessInformation>
21   - <RepositoryID>spase://SMWG/Repository/CDPP/AMDA</RepositoryID>
22   - <Availability>Online</Availability>
23   - <AccessRights>Restricted</AccessRights>
24   - <AccessURL>
25   - <URL>http://amda.cdpp.eu</URL>
26   - </AccessURL>
27   - <Format>NetCDF</Format>
28   - </AccessInformation>
29   - <ProviderName>IRFU via ImperialCollege</ProviderName>
30   - <InstrumentID>spase://CDPP/Instrument/AMDA/Rosetta/LAP</InstrumentID>
31   - <MeasurementType>ThermalPlasma</MeasurementType>
32   - <TemporalDescription>
33   - <TimeSpan>
34   - <StartDate>2014-03-24T08:12:59Z</StartDate>
35   - <StopDate>2016-09-30T10:31:16Z</StopDate>
36   - </TimeSpan>
37   - <Cadence_Min>PT1.6S</Cadence_Min>
38   - <Cadence_Max>PT128S</Cadence_Max>
39   - </TemporalDescription>
40   - <Parameter>
41   - <Name>plasma density</Name>
42   - <ParameterKey>ros_lap_n</ParameterKey>
43   - <Ucd/>
44   - <Units>cm^-3</Units>
45   - <RenderingHints>
46   - <DisplayType>TimeSeries</DisplayType>
47   - </RenderingHints>
48   - <FillValue>-1000.0</FillValue>
49   - </Parameter>
50   - <Parameter>
51   - <Name>elec temperature</Name>
52   - <ParameterKey>ros_lap_t</ParameterKey>
53   - <Ucd/>
54   - <Units>eV</Units>
55   - <RenderingHints>
56   - <DisplayType>TimeSeries</DisplayType>
57   - </RenderingHints>
58   - <FillValue>-1000.0</FillValue>
59   - </Parameter>
60   - <Parameter>
61   - <Name>s/c voltage</Name>
62   - <ParameterKey>ros_lap_v</ParameterKey>
63   - <Ucd/>
64   - <Units>V</Units>
65   - <RenderingHints>
66   - <DisplayType>TimeSeries</DisplayType>
67   - </RenderingHints>
68   - <FillValue>-1000.0</FillValue>
69   - </Parameter>
70   - </NumericalData>
71   -</Spase>
NumericalData/AMDA/Rosetta/LAP/ros-lap-ned.xml
... ... @@ -29,13 +29,21 @@ does not prevent plasma electrons from reaching the Langmuir probes.
29 29 <Role>DataProducer</Role>
30 30 </Contact>
31 31 <InformationURL>
  32 + <Name>RPC User Guide</Name>
  33 + <URL>http://amda.irap.omp.eu/help/parameters/RPC_USER_GUIDE.PDF</URL>
  34 + </InformationURL>
  35 + <InformationURL>
32 36 <Name>RPC LAP User Guide</Name>
33 37 <URL>http://amda.irap.omp.eu/help/parameters/RO-IRFU-LAP-UG.PDF</URL>
34 38 </InformationURL>
35   - <InformationURL>
36   - <Name>ROSETTA RPC-LAP to Planetary Science Archive Interface Control Document</Name>
  39 + <InformationURL>
  40 + <Name>RPC-LAP to Planetary Science Archive Interface Control Document</Name>
37 41 <URL>http://amda.irap.omp.eu/help/parameters/RO-IRFU-LAP-EAICD.PDF</URL>
38 42 </InformationURL>
  43 + <InformationURL>
  44 + <Name>RPC-LAP Report on cross-calibration of LAP data to measurements by other RPC instruments</Name>
  45 + <URL>http://amda.irap.omp.eu/help/parameters/RO-IRFU-LAP-XCAL.PDF</URL>
  46 + </InformationURL>
39 47 </ResourceHeader>
40 48 <AccessInformation>
41 49 <RepositoryID>spase://SMWG/Repository/CDPP/AMDA</RepositoryID>
... ... @@ -55,13 +63,11 @@ does not prevent plasma electrons from reaching the Langmuir probes.
55 63 <StartDate>2014-03-24T08:12:59Z</StartDate>
56 64 <StopDate>2016-09-30T10:31:16Z</StopDate>
57 65 </TimeSpan>
58   - <Cadence_Min>PT40S</Cadence_Min>
  66 + <Cadence_Min>PT32S</Cadence_Min>
59 67 <Cadence_Max>PT160S</Cadence_Max>
60 68 </TemporalDescription>
61 69 <Caveats>
62   - It is highly recommended to take into account quality value while working with plasma density.
63   - * Parameter n_e_good corresponds to n_e quality gt 0.2
64   - * Parameter n_e - all n_e quality values
  70 + It is highly recommended to take into account quality value while working with plasma density.
65 71 * Note that you can colorize n_e parameter with the quality value (use ColoredParameter field of Plot Interface).
66 72 * Please always download quality value along with the n_e parameter.
67 73 Data Source :
... ... @@ -86,20 +92,7 @@ Quality flag event description :
86 92 * +400 - Saturation
87 93  
88 94 Example: suppose that one encounters the quality flag โ€œ109โ€. 109 = 100 + 9 means (1) that there is an ongoing wheel off-loading (+100), and (2) that the quality-related effects associated with +1 and +2 cannot occur even in principle for the kind of data that one is looking at.
89   -
90   -
91   -</Caveats>
92   - <Parameter>
93   - <Name>n_e_good (qual_ned&gt; 0.2)</Name>
94   - <ParameterKey>ros_lap_ned_good</ParameterKey>
95   - <Description>Plasma density derived from individual spacecraft potential measurements on one illuminated probe when quality value &gt; 0.2</Description>
96   - <Ucd/>
97   - <Units>cm^-3</Units>
98   - <RenderingHints>
99   - <DisplayType>TimeSeries</DisplayType>
100   - </RenderingHints>
101   - <FillValue>-1.e+09</FillValue>
102   - </Parameter>
  95 +</Caveats>
103 96 <Parameter>
104 97 <Name>n_e (ned)</Name>
105 98 <ParameterKey>ros_lap_ned</ParameterKey>
... ...
NumericalData/AMDA/Rosetta/LAP/ros-lap-nel.xml
... ... @@ -20,13 +20,21 @@ measurements or floating potential measurements on one probe.&lt;/Description&gt;
20 20 <Role>DataProducer</Role>
21 21 </Contact>
22 22 <InformationURL>
  23 + <Name>RPC User Guide</Name>
  24 + <URL>http://amda.irap.omp.eu/help/parameters/RPC_USER_GUIDE.PDF</URL>
  25 + </InformationURL>
  26 + <InformationURL>
23 27 <Name>RPC LAP User Guide</Name>
24 28 <URL>http://amda.irap.omp.eu/help/parameters/RO-IRFU-LAP-UG.PDF</URL>
25 29 </InformationURL>
26   - <InformationURL>
27   - <Name>ROSETTA RPC-LAP to Planetary Science Archive Interface Control Document</Name>
  30 + <InformationURL>
  31 + <Name>RPC-LAP to Planetary Science Archive Interface Control Document</Name>
28 32 <URL>http://amda.irap.omp.eu/help/parameters/RO-IRFU-LAP-EAICD.PDF</URL>
29 33 </InformationURL>
  34 + <InformationURL>
  35 + <Name>RPC-LAP Report on cross-calibration of LAP data to measurements by other RPC instruments</Name>
  36 + <URL>http://amda.irap.omp.eu/help/parameters/RO-IRFU-LAP-XCAL.PDF</URL>
  37 + </InformationURL>
30 38 </ResourceHeader>
31 39 <AccessInformation>
32 40 <RepositoryID>spase://SMWG/Repository/CDPP/AMDA</RepositoryID>
... ... @@ -76,8 +84,7 @@ measurements or floating potential measurements on one probe.&lt;/Description&gt;
76 84 * +200 - One of two meanings: (1) For LAP1: LDL disturbance (LAP2 in LDL mode); (2) For LAP2: Contamination signature possibly present
77 85 * +400 - Saturation
78 86  
79   - Example: suppose that one encounters the quality flag โ€œ109โ€. 109 = 100 + 9 means (1) that there is an ongoing wheel off-loading (+100), and (2) that the quality-related effects associated with +1 and +2 cannot occur even in principle for the kind of data that one is looking at.
80   -
  87 + Example: suppose that one encounters the quality flag โ€œ109โ€. 109 = 100 + 9 means (1) that there is an ongoing wheel off-loading (+100), and (2) that the quality-related effects associated with +1 and +2 cannot occur even in principle for the kind of data that one is looking at.
81 88 </Caveats>
82 89 <Parameter>
83 90 <Name>n_e_good (qual_nel&gt; 0.2)</Name>
... ...
NumericalData/AMDA/Rosetta/LAP/ros-lap-pho.xml
... ... @@ -8,8 +8,8 @@
8 8 <AlternateName>Photosaturation current derived collectively from multiple sweeps</AlternateName>
9 9 <ReleaseDate>2016-10-15T14:08:29Z</ReleaseDate>
10 10 <Description>There are two estimates of the photoemission current from LAP1 sweeps of a sunlit probe.
11   -I_PH0 in PHO files is a statistical estimate from several sweeps (over 60 minute
12   -windows), while I_PHO in the ASW files is an estimate from a single sweep with larger
  11 +I_PH0_60M in PH0 files is a statistical estimate from several sweeps (over 60 minute
  12 +windows), while I_PH0_S in the ASW files is an estimate from a single sweep with larger
13 13 uncertainties but higher time resolution (usually 160 s). As LAP1 has shown no significant
14 14 contamination effects, these estimates should be directly proportional to the EUV flux at the
15 15 Rosetta position in the 20-130 nm band [Johansson et al, 2017]. For LAP2, the same
... ... @@ -37,13 +37,21 @@ though no other such effects have been noted on LAP1&lt;/Description&gt;
37 37 <Role>DataProducer</Role>
38 38 </Contact>
39 39 <InformationURL>
  40 + <Name>RPC User Guide</Name>
  41 + <URL>http://amda.irap.omp.eu/help/parameters/RPC_USER_GUIDE.PDF</URL>
  42 + </InformationURL>
  43 + <InformationURL>
40 44 <Name>RPC LAP User Guide</Name>
41 45 <URL>http://amda.irap.omp.eu/help/parameters/RO-IRFU-LAP-UG.PDF</URL>
42 46 </InformationURL>
43 47 <InformationURL>
44   - <Name>ROSETTA RPC-LAP to Planetary Science Archive Interface Control Document</Name>
  48 + <Name>RPC-LAP to Planetary Science Archive Interface Control Document</Name>
45 49 <URL>http://amda.irap.omp.eu/help/parameters/RO-IRFU-LAP-EAICD.PDF</URL>
46 50 </InformationURL>
  51 + <InformationURL>
  52 + <Name>RPC-LAP Report on cross-calibration of LAP data to measurements by other RPC instruments</Name>
  53 + <URL>http://amda.irap.omp.eu/help/parameters/RO-IRFU-LAP-XCAL.PDF</URL>
  54 + </InformationURL>
47 55 </ResourceHeader>
48 56 <AccessInformation>
49 57 <RepositoryID>spase://SMWG/Repository/CDPP/AMDA</RepositoryID>
... ... @@ -85,7 +93,7 @@ though no other such effects have been noted on LAP1&lt;/Description&gt;
85 93  
86 94 </Caveats>
87 95 <Parameter>
88   - <Name>i_pho</Name>
  96 + <Name>i_ph0_60m</Name>
89 97 <ParameterKey>ros_lap_pho</ParameterKey>
90 98 <Description>Photosaturation current derived collectively from multiple sweeps</Description>
91 99 <Ucd/>
... ... @@ -96,7 +104,7 @@ though no other such effects have been noted on LAP1&lt;/Description&gt;
96 104 <FillValue>-1.e9</FillValue>
97 105 </Parameter>
98 106 <Parameter>
99   - <Name>i_pho : qual</Name>
  107 + <Name>i_ph0_60m : qual</Name>
100 108 <ParameterKey>ros_lap_pho_q</ParameterKey>
101 109 <Description>Quality value in the range 0 (worst) to 1 (best).
102 110 Corresponds to goodness of fit or how well the model fits the data.</Description>
... ...
NumericalData/AMDA/Rosetta/LAP/ros-lap-usc.xml
... ... @@ -31,13 +31,21 @@
31 31 <Role>DataProducer</Role>
32 32 </Contact>
33 33 <InformationURL>
  34 + <Name>RPC User Guide</Name>
  35 + <URL>http://amda.irap.omp.eu/help/parameters/RPC_USER_GUIDE.PDF</URL>
  36 + </InformationURL>
  37 + <InformationURL>
34 38 <Name>RPC LAP User Guide</Name>
35 39 <URL>http://amda.irap.omp.eu/help/parameters/RO-IRFU-LAP-UG.PDF</URL>
36 40 </InformationURL>
37 41 <InformationURL>
38   - <Name>ROSETTA RPC-LAP to Planetary Science Archive Interface Control Document</Name>
  42 + <Name>RPC-LAP to Planetary Science Archive Interface Control Document</Name>
39 43 <URL>http://amda.irap.omp.eu/help/parameters/RO-IRFU-LAP-EAICD.PDF</URL>
40 44 </InformationURL>
  45 + <InformationURL>
  46 + <Name>RPC-LAP Report on cross-calibration of LAP data to measurements by other RPC instruments</Name>
  47 + <URL>http://amda.irap.omp.eu/help/parameters/RO-IRFU-LAP-XCAL.PDF</URL>
  48 + </InformationURL>
41 49 </ResourceHeader>
42 50 <AccessInformation>
43 51 <RepositoryID>spase://SMWG/Repository/CDPP/AMDA</RepositoryID>
... ...