CDPP / CNES

Commit 1b0fd0d4ef45ef63701880f679f1b931ec784e59

Authored by Benjamin Renard
1 parent 4275d3cc
Exists in juice_jdc and in 4 other branches amdadev, autocommit, cleanup_registry_master, cleanup_registry_merged

Fix provider & description for MMS FGM datasets

Showing 8 changed files with 36 additions and 12 deletions   Show diff stats
Inline Side-by-side
NumericalData/CDPP-AMDA/MMS/MMS1/FGM/mms1-fgm-brst.xml
  Diff comments   View file @1b0fd0d
... ... @@ -57,7 +57,7 @@
57 57 </AccessURL>
58 58 <Format>NetCDF</Format>
59 59 </AccessInformation>
60   - <ProviderName>IRAP</ProviderName>
  60 + <ProviderName>LASP</ProviderName>
61 61 <InstrumentID>spase://CNES/Instrument/CDPP-AMDA/MMS1/FGM</InstrumentID>
62 62 <MeasurementType>MagneticField</MeasurementType>
63 63 <TemporalDescription>
... ...
NumericalData/CDPP-AMDA/MMS/MMS1/FGM/mms1-fgm-srvy.xml
  Diff comments   View file @1b0fd0d
... ... @@ -7,7 +7,13 @@
7 7 <ResourceName>survey</ResourceName>
8 8 <AlternateName>survey</AlternateName>
9 9 <ReleaseDate>2017-01-16T11:50:00</ReleaseDate>
10   - <Description></Description>
  10 + <Description>For the purpose of creating a unified FGM Level 2 data product, burst mode data is taken from DFG and survey mode data is taken
  11 + from AFG. Because AFG and DFG are cross-calibrated on an orbit-averaged basis,
  12 + small differences in offset may be observed between Level2 burst and survey mode
  13 + data. Consequently, any differences are within the error of the measurement. Based on preliminary analysis of the data,
  14 + the absolute error within the Region of Interest (ROI) is estimated to be no more than 0.1 nT in the spin-plane,
  15 + 0.15 nT along the spin-axis and 0.2 nT in total magnitude
  16 + </Description>
11 17 <Contact>
12 18 <PersonID>spase://CNES/Person/James.L.Burch</PersonID>
13 19 <Role>PrincipalInvestigator</Role>
... ... @@ -51,7 +57,7 @@
51 57 </AccessURL>
52 58 <Format>NetCDF</Format>
53 59 </AccessInformation>
54   - <ProviderName>IRAP</ProviderName>
  60 + <ProviderName>LASP</ProviderName>
55 61 <InstrumentID>spase://CNES/Instrument/CDPP-AMDA/MMS1/FGM</InstrumentID>
56 62 <MeasurementType>MagneticField</MeasurementType>
57 63 <TemporalDescription>
... ...
NumericalData/CDPP-AMDA/MMS/MMS2/FGM/mms2-fgm-brst.xml
  Diff comments   View file @1b0fd0d
... ... @@ -57,7 +57,7 @@
57 57 </AccessURL>
58 58 <Format>NetCDF</Format>
59 59 </AccessInformation>
60   - <ProviderName>IRAP</ProviderName>
  60 + <ProviderName>LASP</ProviderName>
61 61 <InstrumentID>spase://CNES/Instrument/CDPP-AMDA/MMS2/FGM</InstrumentID>
62 62 <MeasurementType>MagneticField</MeasurementType>
63 63 <TemporalDescription>
... ...
NumericalData/CDPP-AMDA/MMS/MMS2/FGM/mms2-fgm-srvy.xml
  Diff comments   View file @1b0fd0d
... ... @@ -7,7 +7,13 @@
7 7 <ResourceName>survey</ResourceName>
8 8 <AlternateName>survey</AlternateName>
9 9 <ReleaseDate>2017-01-16T11:50:00</ReleaseDate>
10   - <Description></Description>
  10 + <Description>For the purpose of creating a unified FGM Level 2 data product, burst mode data is taken from DFG and survey mode data is taken
  11 + from AFG. Because AFG and DFG are cross-calibrated on an orbit-averaged basis,
  12 + small differences in offset may be observed between Level2 burst and survey mode
  13 + data. Consequently, any differences are within the error of the measurement. Based on preliminary analysis of the data,
  14 + the absolute error within the Region of Interest (ROI) is estimated to be no more than 0.1 nT in the spin-plane,
  15 + 0.15 nT along the spin-axis and 0.2 nT in total magnitude
  16 + </Description>
11 17 <Contact>
12 18 <PersonID>spase://CNES/Person/James.L.Burch</PersonID>
13 19 <Role>PrincipalInvestigator</Role>
... ... @@ -51,7 +57,7 @@
51 57 </AccessURL>
52 58 <Format>NetCDF</Format>
53 59 </AccessInformation>
54   - <ProviderName>IRAP</ProviderName>
  60 + <ProviderName>LASP</ProviderName>
55 61 <InstrumentID>spase://CNES/Instrument/CDPP-AMDA/MMS2/FGM</InstrumentID>
56 62 <MeasurementType>MagneticField</MeasurementType>
57 63 <TemporalDescription>
... ...
NumericalData/CDPP-AMDA/MMS/MMS3/FGM/mms3-fgm-brst.xml
  Diff comments   View file @1b0fd0d
... ... @@ -57,7 +57,7 @@
57 57 </AccessURL>
58 58 <Format>NetCDF</Format>
59 59 </AccessInformation>
60   - <ProviderName>IRAP</ProviderName>
  60 + <ProviderName>LASP</ProviderName>
61 61 <InstrumentID>spase://CNES/Instrument/CDPP-AMDA/MMS3/FGM</InstrumentID>
62 62 <MeasurementType>MagneticField</MeasurementType>
63 63 <TemporalDescription>
... ...
NumericalData/CDPP-AMDA/MMS/MMS3/FGM/mms3-fgm-srvy.xml
  Diff comments   View file @1b0fd0d
... ... @@ -7,7 +7,13 @@
7 7 <ResourceName>survey</ResourceName>
8 8 <AlternateName>survey</AlternateName>
9 9 <ReleaseDate>2017-01-16T11:50:00</ReleaseDate>
10   - <Description></Description>
  10 + <Description>For the purpose of creating a unified FGM Level 2 data product, burst mode data is taken from DFG and survey mode data is taken
  11 + from AFG. Because AFG and DFG are cross-calibrated on an orbit-averaged basis,
  12 + small differences in offset may be observed between Level2 burst and survey mode
  13 + data. Consequently, any differences are within the error of the measurement. Based on preliminary analysis of the data,
  14 + the absolute error within the Region of Interest (ROI) is estimated to be no more than 0.1 nT in the spin-plane,
  15 + 0.15 nT along the spin-axis and 0.2 nT in total magnitude
  16 + </Description>
11 17 <Contact>
12 18 <PersonID>spase://CNES/Person/James.L.Burch</PersonID>
13 19 <Role>PrincipalInvestigator</Role>
... ... @@ -51,7 +57,7 @@
51 57 </AccessURL>
52 58 <Format>NetCDF</Format>
53 59 </AccessInformation>
54   - <ProviderName>IRAP</ProviderName>
  60 + <ProviderName>LASP</ProviderName>
55 61 <InstrumentID>spase://CNES/Instrument/CDPP-AMDA/MMS3/FGM</InstrumentID>
56 62 <MeasurementType>MagneticField</MeasurementType>
57 63 <TemporalDescription>
... ...
NumericalData/CDPP-AMDA/MMS/MMS4/FGM/mms4-fgm-brst.xml
  Diff comments   View file @1b0fd0d
... ... @@ -57,7 +57,7 @@
57 57 </AccessURL>
58 58 <Format>NetCDF</Format>
59 59 </AccessInformation>
60   - <ProviderName>IRAP</ProviderName>
  60 + <ProviderName>LASP</ProviderName>
61 61 <InstrumentID>spase://CNES/Instrument/CDPP-AMDA/MMS4/FGM</InstrumentID>
62 62 <MeasurementType>MagneticField</MeasurementType>
63 63 <TemporalDescription>
... ...
NumericalData/CDPP-AMDA/MMS/MMS4/FGM/mms4-fgm-srvy.xml
  Diff comments   View file @1b0fd0d
... ... @@ -7,7 +7,13 @@
7 7 <ResourceName>survey</ResourceName>
8 8 <AlternateName>survey</AlternateName>
9 9 <ReleaseDate>2017-01-16T11:50:00</ReleaseDate>
10   - <Description></Description>
  10 + <Description>For the purpose of creating a unified FGM Level 2 data product, burst mode data is taken from DFG and survey mode data is taken
  11 + from AFG. Because AFG and DFG are cross-calibrated on an orbit-averaged basis,
  12 + small differences in offset may be observed between Level2 burst and survey mode
  13 + data. Consequently, any differences are within the error of the measurement. Based on preliminary analysis of the data,
  14 + the absolute error within the Region of Interest (ROI) is estimated to be no more than 0.1 nT in the spin-plane,
  15 + 0.15 nT along the spin-axis and 0.2 nT in total magnitude
  16 + </Description>
11 17 <Contact>
12 18 <PersonID>spase://CNES/Person/James.L.Burch</PersonID>
13 19 <Role>PrincipalInvestigator</Role>
... ... @@ -51,7 +57,7 @@
51 57 </AccessURL>
52 58 <Format>NetCDF</Format>
53 59 </AccessInformation>
54   - <ProviderName>IRAP</ProviderName>
  60 + <ProviderName>LASP</ProviderName>
55 61 <InstrumentID>spase://CNES/Instrument/CDPP-AMDA/MMS4/FGM</InstrumentID>
56 62 <MeasurementType>MagneticField</MeasurementType>
57 63 <TemporalDescription>
... ...