Blame view

NumericalData/AMDA/Rosetta/LAP/ros-lap-efl.xml 8.23 KB
303f2ca9   Elena.Budnik   Rosetta LAP EFL
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<Spase xmlns="http://www.spase-group.org/data/schema" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.spase-group.org/data/schema http://cdpp.irap.omp.eu/AMDA-NG/public/schemas/spase-amda-1_2_0.xsd">
    <Version>2.2.6</Version>
    <NumericalData>
        <ResourceID>spase://CDPP/NumericalData/AMDA/Rosetta/LAP/ros-lap-efl</ResourceID>
        <ResourceHeader>
            <ResourceName>e-field component (EFL)</ResourceName>
            <AlternateName>Electric field component, calculated on ground by
taking the difference between floating probe measurements on both probes and
ad7a238e   Elena.Budnik   small cor in LAP EFL
10
dividing by distance</AlternateName>
303f2ca9   Elena.Budnik   Rosetta LAP EFL
11
12
13
14
15
16
            <ReleaseDate>2016-10-15T14:08:29Z</ReleaseDate>
            <Description>
The two LAP probes could be used to measure the component of the electric field along their 
separation vector, by measuring the voltage of them, taking the difference and dividing by the 
separation distance (5.0 m). Each probe could be fed by a bias current as is typically done on 
electric field instruments in tenuous plasmas, or be disconnected from the bias circuitry to 
ad7a238e   Elena.Budnik   small cor in LAP EFL
17
ensure a good zero bias current (floating probes) as is typically done on sounding rockets.  
303f2ca9   Elena.Budnik   Rosetta LAP EFL
18
Bias currents were used in the early part of the mission, but when the comet ionosphere 
ad7a238e   Elena.Budnik   small cor in LAP EFL
19
developed, the floating mode was found to give much more consistent data. Only data from 
303f2ca9   Elena.Budnik   Rosetta LAP EFL
20
21
22
the floating mode have been used for providing E-field data, and only when both probes are 
sunlit.

ad7a238e   Elena.Budnik   small cor in LAP EFL
23
24
Positive value refers to electric field  pointing in the direction from probe 1 to probe 2.
 
303f2ca9   Elena.Budnik   Rosetta LAP EFL
25
26
27
The booms are not equal in length (2.24 and 1.62 m) and mounted on a big spacecraft (solar 
panel wingspan 32 m), so one cannot expect LAP to provide a useful DC electric field estimate. 
A moving average of the E-field over 32 s is therefore subtracted from the data in the EFL files. 
ad7a238e   Elena.Budnik   small cor in LAP EFL
28
29
The effective bandwidth of the data therefore is about 0.03 Hz to 20 Hz, the upper 
limit set by the analog anti-aliasing filters. Note that the filtering may distort the lowest 
303f2ca9   Elena.Budnik   Rosetta LAP EFL
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
frequencies. 

There are no external comparison data for assessing the absolute accuracy of the LAP E-field 
measurements. The data themselves look very clean and well behaved [Karlsson et al., 2017; 
André et al, 2017], with very little of common mode signal remaining, despite the s/c poten tial 
being both high and highly variable. The technique with floating probes is proven on numerous 
sounding rockets in the terrestrial ionosphere [Maynard, 1998].
</Description>
            <Contact>       
                <PersonID>spase://CDPP/Person/Anders.Eriksson</PersonID>
                <Role>PrincipalInvestigator</Role>
            </Contact>
            <Contact>       
                <PersonID>spase://CDPP/Person/Erik.Johansson</PersonID>
                <Role>DataProducer</Role>
            </Contact>
            <InformationURL>
                <Name>RPC LAP User Guide</Name>
                <URL>http://amda.irap.omp.eu/help/parameters/RO-IRFU-LAP-UG.PDF</URL>
            </InformationURL> 
            <InformationURL>
                <Name>ROSETTA RPC-LAP to Planetary Science Archive Interface Control Document</Name>
9ccc936a   Elena.Budnik   Rosetta LAP final
52
                <URL>http://amda.irap.omp.eu/help/parameters/RO-IRFU-LAP-EAICD.PDF</URL>
303f2ca9   Elena.Budnik   Rosetta LAP EFL
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
            </InformationURL>
        </ResourceHeader>
        <AccessInformation>
            <RepositoryID>spase://SMWG/Repository/CDPP/AMDA</RepositoryID>
            <Availability>Online</Availability>
            <AccessRights>Restricted</AccessRights>
            <AccessURL>
                <URL>http://amda.cdpp.eu</URL>
            </AccessURL>
            <Format>NetCDF</Format>
        </AccessInformation>
        <ProviderName>PSA</ProviderName>  
        <ProviderResourceName>RO-C-RPCLAP-5-xxx-DERIV2-V1.0</ProviderResourceName>
        <InstrumentID>spase://CDPP/Instrument/AMDA/Rosetta/LAP</InstrumentID>
        <MeasurementType>ThermalPlasma</MeasurementType>
        <TemporalDescription>
            <TimeSpan>
                <StartDate>2014-03-24T08:12:59Z</StartDate>
                <StopDate>2016-09-30T10:31:16Z</StopDate>
            </TimeSpan>
            <Cadence_Min>PT0.05S</Cadence_Min>
            <Cadence_Max>PT35S</Cadence_Max>
        </TemporalDescription>
9ccc936a   Elena.Budnik   Rosetta LAP final
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
        <Caveats>Sampling config : Value | Averaged Samples | DownSampling Rate
           *   0  |   1    |   1
           *   1  |   2    |   1 
           *   2  |   2    |   2
           *   3  |   4    |   4
           *   4  |  64    |   4
           *   5  |  32    |  32        
           *   6  |  64    |  32
           *   7  |  64    |  64
           *   8  | 128    | 128
           *   9  | 256    | 256
           
           Quality Flag : 
           
           A quality flag is a (base 10) integer that is constructed in the two steps below:
           * Add together the constants associated with the relevant quality-related effects listed below. Note that these constants are chosen such that every digit represents up to three true/false values for the presence/absence of three specific separate quality-related effects.
           * Should the three quality-related effects be irrelevant for the given data product, then that digit is replaced by the digit “9”.
           
           Quality flag event description :
           * +1 - Low quality sweep analysis model fit
           * +2 - One of two meanings: (1) Low sample size; an average is based on fewer data points than nominal (due to filtering or otherwise) and applies to sweep steps and downsampled time series. (2) zero-padding; zeros replace lost samples for the purpose of calculating PSD.
           * +10 - One of two meanings: (1) Sweep data product and data products based on sweeps: SAA rotation of more than 0.05° during sweep. (2) Downsampled time series data product: Bias change within the 32 s downsampling period.
           * +20 - Probe in partial or full shadow
           * +100 - Rosetta wheel off-loading (WOL) or Orbit-control-maneuver (OCM)
           * +200 - One of two meanings: (1) For LAP1: LDL disturbance (LAP2 in LDL mode); (2) For LAP2: Contamination signature possibly present
           * +400 - Saturation
           
           Example: suppose that one encounters the quality flag “109”. 109 = 100 + 9 means (1) that there is an ongoing wheel off-loading (+100), and (2) that the quality-related effects associated with +1 and +2 cannot occur even in principle for the kind of data that one is looking at.           
           
           
        </Caveats>
303f2ca9   Elena.Budnik   Rosetta LAP EFL
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
        <Parameter>
            <Name>e-field comp</Name>
            <ParameterKey>ros_lap_efl</ParameterKey>
            <Description>Electric field component, calculated on ground by 
                taking the difference between floating probe measurements on both probes and 
                dividing by distance, (V_P2-V_P1)/L. Positive value refers to electric field 
                pointing in the direction from probe 1 to probe 2.</Description>
            <Ucd/>
            <Units>mV/m</Units>
            <RenderingHints>
                <DisplayType>TimeSeries</DisplayType>
            </RenderingHints>
            <FillValue>-1.e+09</FillValue>
        </Parameter>        
        <Parameter>
            <Name>sampling conf</Name>
            <ParameterKey>ros_lap_efl_s</ParameterKey>
9ccc936a   Elena.Budnik   Rosetta LAP final
124
125
            <Description>Number that describes the exact combination of onboard s/w averaging and downsampling. The exact values are pointers into a table 
that describes both the number of samples that are averaged over and the downsampling rate</Description>
303f2ca9   Elena.Budnik   Rosetta LAP EFL
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
            <Ucd/>
            <Units/>         
            <RenderingHints>
                <DisplayType>TimeSeries</DisplayType>
            </RenderingHints> 
        </Parameter>
        <Parameter>
            <Name>quality flag</Name>
            <ParameterKey>ros_lap_efl_f</ParameterKey>
9ccc936a   Elena.Budnik   Rosetta LAP final
135
            <Description>Quality flag constructed as the sum of multiple terms, depending on what quality related effects are present. Each digit is either in 
303f2ca9   Elena.Budnik   Rosetta LAP EFL
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
the range 0 (best) to 7 (worst), or 9 (not used).</Description>
            <Ucd/>
            <Units/>         
            <RenderingHints>
                <DisplayType>TimeSeries</DisplayType>
            </RenderingHints> 
        </Parameter>            
     </NumericalData>
</Spase>