Blame view

NumericalData/AMDA/Cassini/RPWS/cass-lp-ni.xml 3.42 KB
07f82115   Elena.Budnik   update
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<Spase xmlns="http://www.spase-group.org/data/schema" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.spase-group.org/data/schema http://cdpp.irap.omp.eu/AMDA-NG/public/schemas/spase-amda-1_2_0.xsd">
    <Version>2.2.6</Version>
    <NumericalData>
        <ResourceID>spase://CDPP/NumericalData/AMDA/Cassini/RPWS/cass-lp-ni</ResourceID>
        <ResourceHeader>
            <ResourceName>ion proxy</ResourceName>
            <AlternateName>Langmuir Probe : ion density proxy</AlternateName>
            <ReleaseDate>2017-08-19T17:01:00</ReleaseDate>
33fa10a5   Elena.Budnik   time update
10
            <Description>Densities are derived from the voltage sweeps of the Cassini Langmuir probe. The data reduction method is described in detail in Holmberg et al. 2012 and Holmberg et al. 2017.</Description>
07f82115   Elena.Budnik   update
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
            <Contact>
                <PersonID>spase://CDPP/Person/Mika.Holmberg</PersonID>
                <Role>DataProducer</Role>
            </Contact>
            <InformationURL>
                <URL/>
            </InformationURL>
        </ResourceHeader>
        <AccessInformation>
            <RepositoryID>spase://SMWG/Repository/CDPP/AMDA</RepositoryID>
            <Availability>Online</Availability>
            <AccessRights>Open</AccessRights>
            <AccessURL>
                <Name>AMDA</Name>
                <URL>amda.cdpp.eu</URL>
            </AccessURL>
            <Format>Text</Format>
        </AccessInformation>
        <ProviderName>IRAP</ProviderName>
        <InstrumentID>spase://CDPP/Instrument/AMDA/Cassini/RPWS</InstrumentID>
33fa10a5   Elena.Budnik   time update
31
        <MeasurementType>ThermalPlasma</MeasurementType>
07f82115   Elena.Budnik   update
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
        <TemporalDescription>
            <TimeSpan>
                <StartDate>2005-02-16T05:10:50Z</StartDate>
                <StopDate>2016-06-29T19:36:05Z</StopDate>                
            </TimeSpan>
            <Cadence_Min>PT32S</Cadence_Min>
            <Cadence_Max>PT1H</Cadence_Max>
        </TemporalDescription>
        <ObservedRegion>Saturn</ObservedRegion>
33fa10a5   Elena.Budnik   time update
41
42
43
44
        <Caveats>Problems that are still present in the data set: Possible ring eclipse cases (very rare), measurements within interchange injections (commonly seen as one point with densities 10 times larger than it’s surrounding data points (very rare)), spacecraft wake measurements that have not properly been removed (rare), moon eclipses (very rare).
          
            Each data point corresponds to one voltage sweep. Occasionally the fit to the sweep is not very good. Usually a data point with an error 3 times the estimated value or larger is considered a bad data point, but this has to be evaluated from case to case. A good way to do this is to compare with the electron density derived from the upper hybrid resonance frequency or with the ion density obtained from CAPS measurements. The data can also be compared to previous measurements from the same region which should show similar densities.</Caveats>
        
07f82115   Elena.Budnik   update
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
        <Parameter>
            <Name>ion density</Name>
            <ParameterKey>cass_lp_ni</ParameterKey>
            <Ucd/>
            <Units>cm-3</Units>
            <RenderingHints>
                <DisplayType>TimeSeries</DisplayType>
            </RenderingHints>           
            <Particle>
                <ParticleType>Ion</ParticleType>
                <ParticleQuantity>NumberDensity</ParticleQuantity>
            </Particle>
        </Parameter>                       
    </NumericalData>
</Spase>